The following points must be covered by the Collegiate Procedures (as approved by the Provost) to satisfy a requirement of or to provide a variation from a provision of these Procedures:

• General Principles: the composition of the DCG with regards to additional clinical-track faculty members from outsider the department;
• General Principles: who will perform the functions assigned in these Procedures to the DEO, if they will not be performed by an individual who holds that title;
• General Principles: in nondepartmentalized colleges, what the role of department-like units and their administrative officers, if any, will be;
• General Principles: how and when a candidate will notify the department and/or college of his or her interest in being reviewed for promotion;
• I.B.(1) the date that substantive material for the promotion dossier will be due from the candidate, if before September 1;
• I.B.(3)(f) any supplementary material to be included in the dossier in addition to the required minimum described in these Procedures;
• I.C. who shall perform the internal peer evaluations of teaching, professional productivity, and clinical and other service;
• I.D.(1)–(4) details about the process of peer observation of teaching;
• I.E.(1) details about the process of peer evaluation of the candidate’s professional productivity (including who will perform the evaluation);
• I.E.(4) how the internal peer reviews of professional productivity will be supplemented by reviewers external to the department, college, and/or University
• I.F.(1) details about the process of peer evaluation of the candidate’s clinical and other service (including who will perform the evaluation);
• I.F.(4) how the internal peer reviews of clinical and other service will be supplemented by reviewers external to the department, college, and/or University;
• I.G.(1) when the process of selection of external reviewers will begin;
• I.G.(2) how many external reviewers will be asked to provide assessments of the candidate’s professional productivity and/or clinical and other service, and what materials each will review;
• I.G.(7) the process by which the DEO will select the final list of external reviewers;
• I.H.(2) the period of time allowed the candidate to review the internal peer evaluations of teaching, professional productivity, and service for factual errors (normally five to ten working days) and submit a letter correcting factual errors;
• I.I.(4) details of the DCG’s voting procedure, and how the DCG determines which of its members will prepare the summary report of its discussion, document the final vote, and enter that information into the Promotion Record