1. If the candidate submits a letter of response to the DEO’s letter to the Dean, the Dean will place the candidate’s letter in the Promotion Record.
2. No unsolicited correspondence evaluating the candidate's record, whether signed or anonymous, will be entered into the Promotion Record at the Collegiate level.

The Collegiate Consulting Group shall participate in the promotion decision-making process as follows:

1. Each year the Dean of the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, in consultation with the College’s elected Executive Committee, appoints a Collegiate Committee on Faculty Promotion and Tenure, which serves as the collegiate consulting group. The Committee consists of nine tenured full professors who represent the various disciplines of the College; members are appointed for one year and can serve no more than 3 years consecutively. A member of the Collegiate Committee participates in the promotion decision for a candidate from their department at the departmental level and may not participate in the Collegiate Committee’s deliberations or voting in regard to that candidate.
   In years when there are clinical-track promotion decisions to be made, the Dean in consultation with the Executive Committee will appoint an additional member of the Committee: an eligible faculty member holding the rank of clinical professor to serve on the Collegiate Committee on a limited basis. During the consideration of each clinical-track candidate being considered for promotion, the clinical professor will participate as a voting member of the Collegiate Committee. The Dean may appoint to the Collegiate Committee a clinical professor whose faculty appointment is in another college of the University.
2. The Dean and the Associate Deans participate in the meetings of the Collegiate Committee on Faculty Promotion and Tenure. Neither the Dean nor the Associate Deans vote with the Collegiate Committee on Faculty Promotion and Tenure nor do they contribute to the written report summarizing the Collegiate Committee’s discussion. The Dean of the College and those associate deans with appointments of 50% or greater in the Dean's Office cannot participate in the Departmental Consulting Group in the departments in which they hold faculty appointments. (See the definition of Departmental Consulting Group in these procedures.)
3. The Promotion Record available to the Collegiate Committee on Faculty Promotion and Tenure will consist of the Promotion Record available to the DEO, with the same sample of work related to the candidate’s professional productivity and clinical or other service that was sent to the external evaluators. The Promotion Record available to the Collegiate Committee will also include the DEO’s letter and the candidate’s letter of response (if any) following receipt of the DCG’s recorded vote and summary report with recommendation and the letter of recommendation of the DEO to the Dean. For information on student evaluations of teaching that is sent forward to the Dean’s Office, see I.D.6.
4. If the Collegiate Committee on Faculty Promotion and Tenure finds it necessary for clarification or supplementation of the Promotion Record, the Collegiate Committee may submit to the DCG and/or the DEO a written request for additional information. The Collegiate Committee will enter any information thus obtained into the Promotion Record.
5. The Collegiate Committee on Faculty Promotion and Tenure (with the membership described in section II.B.1, above) meets with discusses the candidate's promotion record in a meeting with the Dean and the Associate Deans
   1. to discuss the candidate’s qualifications,
   2. to vote and make a recommendation for or against the granting of promotion, with a 60% majority of those present for the discussion defining a positive recommendation for promotion, and
   3. to assign one or more of its members
          1. to prepare a summary report of the discussion, if its recommendation to the Dean is contrary to that of the DCG or DEO;
          2. to document the final vote, and
          3. to enter that information into the Promotion Record.
6. The Collegiate Committee’s vote and recommendation, and the summary report of its discussion, if any, will be transmitted to the Dean. The Dean adds the Collegiate Committee’s letter to the candidate’s Promotion Record before transmitting the Promotion Record to the Provost.

The candidate will be given the opportunity to respond to the Collegiate Committee’s recommendation under the following conditions:

1. If the Collegiate Committee’s recommendation is negative and contrary to that of the DCG or DEO, the candidate shall be provided with a copy of the Collegiate Committee’s vote and summary report and, will have 3 days to request access to the Promotion Record, with the following provisions:
   1. the external reviews of the candidate’s professional productivity and/or clinical and other service must be redacted as appropriate to protect the confidentiality of reviewers; and
   2. any comments in the Promotion Record referring to external reviews of the candidate’s scholarship must be redacted as appropriate to protect the confidentiality of reviewers.
2. The candidate will have 5 working days after receiving access to the Promotion Record to submit a written response to the Collegiate Committee’s negative recommendation.

In making the promotion recommendation, the Dean may, at the Dean’s discretion, consult with the College’s Associate Deans. The dean shall participate in the promotion decision-making process as follows:

1. If the candidate submits a written response to the Collegiate Committee’s negative recommendation, the Dean will place the response in the Promotion Record.
2. When any materials which were not available at the time of the departmental action are forwarded by the Departmental Executive Officer to the Dean, the Dean will make a determination whether it is likely that the new material would have substantially altered the departmental evaluation of the candidate’s record by the Departmental Consulting Group and/or the Departmental Executive Officer. If, in the Dean’s judgment, a substantial change in the departmental evaluation is likely, the Dean will return the case to the Departmental Executive Officer for any appropriate supplementary action so that the Dean will be able to act in the light of an accurate indication of departmental judgment.
   If the Dean does not return the case to the Department, the Dean will annotate the new material when it is entered into the Promotion Record, for the Provost’s information, stating that it was not reviewed by the Departmental Consulting Group or the DEO.
3. Based on the Promotion Record, the collegiate Dean will recommend that promotion be granted or denied in a separate letter to the Provost for each candidate.
4. The Dean’s letter to the Provost will explain the Dean’s reasons for recommending for or against promotion stating how the candidate has or has not met the relevant criteria for promotion. As with previous steps in this process, the Dean’s letter to the Provost shall not reiterate the details of material that already is in the dossier; rather, it shall identify those aspects of the dossier that formed the basis of the Dean’s recommendation.
5. When the Dean’s recommendation is contrary to the recommendation of the Departmental Consulting Group, the recommendation of the Departmental Executive Officer, and/or the vote of the Collegiate Committee on Faculty Promotion and Tenure, the Dean’s letter will explain why the contrary recommendation is being made.
6. The Dean’s letter will be transmitted to the Provost as part of the candidate’s Promotion Record.
7. At the same time that the Dean’s letter is submitted to the Provost, the Dean will inform the Departmental Executive Officer of the recommendation that has been forwarded to the Provost. The DEO, in turn, will inform the members of the DCG of the Dean’s recommendation and also will inform the candidate if the Dean’s recommendation is positive.
8. The Dean will transmit to the Provost one copy of the Promotion Record for each candidate in the college, and a single copy of these collegiate procedures governing promotion decision-making.

1. At the same time that the Promotion Record is submitted to the Provost, the Dean will provide the candidate with a copy of the Dean’s letter to the Provost and the recorded vote of the Collegiate Committee on Faculty Promotion and Tenure.
2. In the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, the candidate will be allowed 3 working days after receiving the Dean’s letter containing a negative promotion decision to submit a request to the Provost for access to the Promotion Record, with the following provisions:
   1. the external reviews of the candidate’s professional productivity and/or clinical and other service must be redacted as appropriate to protect the confidentiality of reviewers;
   2. any comments in the Promotion Record referring to external reviews of the candidate’s professional productivity and/or clinical and other service must be redacted as appropriate to protect the confidentiality of reviewers, and
   3. any comments in the Promotion Record referring to the external reviewers or to any other identifiable individual must be redacted as appropriate to protect confidentiality.
3. In the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, the candidate will be allowed 5 working days after having received access to the Promotion Record to submit
   1. a written response to the Dean’s negative recommendation and
   2. additional information to be included in the Promotion Record.
4. If the candidate submits a letter of response to the Provost for inclusion in the Promotion Record, the candidate shall also give the Dean a copy of the response.